Witheral v. Muskegon Booming Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Montgomery, J., presiding.) Trespass on the case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
In November, 1886, the plaintiff, who resides in Missaukee county, commenced this suit against the defendant, in the circuit court for the county of Muskegon, for damages to his premises and property, situated upon the banks *50of the Muskegon river, in Missaukee county, occasioned, as he claims, by the defendant’s wrongful action while in the control and possession of said river, and in the transaction of its business as a booming company.
The claim, as developed upon the trial, was for damages to his hay crop in the years 1881, 1882, 1883, 1885, and 1886, and the loss of pasturage for his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morgan v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Grand Rapids Booming Co. v. JarvisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Field v. Apple River Log Driving Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- White River Log & Booming Co. v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Hubbard v. BellIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Empire Mills Co. v. Burrell Engineering & Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Kamm v. NormandOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Hunter v. Grande Ronde Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Cockerline v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.