Buchanan v. Grand River & Greenville Log Running Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kent. Injunction bill.
1Opinion of the CourtOooiiEY, J.
This is an injunction bill. The general-purpose is to restrain the defendant from interfering with the natural flow of water in Flat river to the prejudice of complainants.
The complainants are owners of a mill site and mill on-said river in the township of Yergennes, and their motive-power is obtained by means of a dam erected and maintained by them. Defendant is a corporation engaged in running logs and timber down Flat river and Grand river, and from the year 1874 when it was organized to the time of the filing-of the bill in 1880 had run from fifty to one hundred and fifty million feet of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dumont v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Thunder Bay River Booming Co. v. SpeechlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Middleton v. Flat River Booming Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Hall v. RoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Snow v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Wausau Street Railroad v. BancroftWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Pickens v. Coal River Boom & Timber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
- Trullinger v. HoweOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Woodin v. WentworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Potter v. Saginaw Union Street RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.