Legal Opinion

Noble v. Dibble

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1922No. 16770PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Wright, J., entered June 17, 1921, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action for an injunction.

1Per curiam

— The purpose of this action is to enjoin the state director of licenses and the dental examining hoard from making examinations for the purpose of permitting persons to practice dentistry in this state, and to prohibit them from issuing any certificates authorizing such practice, and to enjoin the state auditor from issuing warrants to the examining committee in payment for their services, and the state treasurer from paying any such warrants. The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are practicing dentists and are taxpayers in the state of Washington. They allege that the director of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wells v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. In re ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. LittooyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. SextonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Kenna v. Calumet, Hammond & Southeastern RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Senior Citizens League, Inc. v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Home Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Brown v. Palmer Clay Products Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. State ex rel. Jordan v. Department of LicensesWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Senior Citizens League, Inc. v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API