Arshal v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
Plaintiff sues the United States for patent infringement, within our jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (1976). The case is before us on plaintiffs exception to the recommended decision submitted by Trial Judge Browne under Rule 54(a). The trial judge concluded that plaintiffs patent was invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (1976), but denied defendant’s motion for patent invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (1976). He also held that if the patent had been valid, then defendant’s actions amounted to infringement. Upon consideration of the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, we agree with the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- In re FreemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Peter J. Degeorge v. Donald R. BernierCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Brunswick Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Digicourse, Inc. v. Ama Distributors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1984
- James Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.