Legal Opinion

James Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 9, 1988No. 88-1101Published

1Opinion of the Court

848 F.2d 1560

7 U.S.P.Q.2d 1057

James CONSTANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ADVANCED MICRO-DEVICES, INC., Gould, Inc., American

Microsystems, Inc., Analog Devices, Inc., Fujitsu, Ltd.,

Fujitsu Microelectronics, Inc., Digital Switch, Inc.,

Granger Associates, Inc., Hitachi Corporation, Intel, Inc.,

Interactive Circuits & Sys. Ltd., Matshushita Electronics

Corp., Computer Modules, Inc., Nippon Electric Co., Ltd.,

NEC Electronics USA, Paradyne Corporation, Semiconductor

Products, Texas Instruments, Inc. and TRW, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-1101

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

June 9, 1988.

Ja…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API