State v. SUPERIOR CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMA
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.
This special action seeks review of a ruling of the Superior Court of Pima County which denied the State’s motion for a change of venue. Jurisdiction was accepted pursuant to Rules of Procedure for Special Action, 17A A.R.S. Order of the Superior Court vacated.
Rosemary Hooley, real party in interest, filed a law suit against the State of Arizona on March 22, 1978, in the Pima County Superior Court, seeking damages for the wrongful death of her husband. The State timely filed a motion for change of venue. The motion for change of venue was denied, the minute…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Rochlin v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Williams v. Illinois State Scholarship CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- BD. OF CTY. COMM'RS OF MADISON CTY. v. GriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Cooke v. BerlinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Dunn v. CarruthArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Johnson v. University HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.