Legal Opinion

State v. SUPERIOR CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMA

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1978No. 13863PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

This special action seeks review of a ruling of the Superior Court of Pima County which denied the State’s motion for a change of venue. Jurisdiction was accepted pursuant to Rules of Procedure for Special Action, 17A A.R.S. Order of the Superior Court vacated.

Rosemary Hooley, real party in interest, filed a law suit against the State of Arizona on March 22, 1978, in the Pima County Superior Court, seeking damages for the wrongful death of her husband. The State timely filed a motion for change of venue. The motion for change of venue was denied, the minute…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Shaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Rochlin v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Williams v. Illinois State Scholarship CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. BD. OF CTY. COMM'RS OF MADISON CTY. v. GriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Cooke v. BerlinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. Dunn v. CarruthArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Johnson v. University HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API