Legal Opinion

Stevens v. O'Neill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1900PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Hugh O’Neill, from a judgment of the - Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 18th day of November, 1899, upon the verdict of a jury for $3,000, and also from an order entered, in said clerk’s office on the 17th day of November, 1899,. as resettled by an order entered in said clerk’s office .on the 29th day of November, 1899, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon…

Read the full summary

Appeal by the defendant, Hugh O’Neill, from a judgment of the - Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 18th day of November, 1899, upon the verdict of a jury for $3,000, and also from an order entered, in said clerk’s office on the 17th day of November, 1899,. as resettled by an order entered in said clerk’s office .on the 29th day of November, 1899, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Brunt, P. J.:

This action was brought to. recover damages for an alleged false imprisonment. The answer was in effect a general denial. The *365questions raised upon this appeal may be embraced within two classes: First, whether there was evidence enough to justify the jury in finding that there was any false imprisonment; and, second, whether there were any errors committed in the charge of the learned justice who tried the case.

It is claimed upon the part of the defendant that there was no evidence that any restraint was exercised by him or his employees as against the plaintiff, and that…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Loughry v. Lincoln First Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. McLoughlin v. New York Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Craven v. . BloomingdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Bolger v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  5. Crossett v. CampbellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API