Legal Opinion

A. Harris & Co. v. Caldwell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1925No. 9391PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.

This suit is for damages for false imprisonment. Appellant’s answer is the general issue. On a general verdict, judgment in favor of appellees was rendered for $7,500, from which appellant prosecutes this appeal.

It will not be necessary to notice the pleadings of the parties; they were sufficient to admit the evidence adduced, and no question involving the same is presented for our revision.

Appellant in several ways, by appropriate assignments and propositions, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the fact, as found by the jury, that Mrs. Caldwell, on the occasion in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Freeman, ReceiverTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Gold v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Houston Chronicle Pub. Co. v. WegnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Thompson v. BuchholzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Skillern & Sons, Inc. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. JC Penney Company v. DuranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. S. H. Kress & Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Black v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. McClure v. FallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API