Brannen v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters’ statement of tbe ease: The grounds of the respective motions will be found stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Richardson, Ch. J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
In each of these cases a motion is made to present for determination the question of admissibility of certain evidence offered on the part of the claimant.
One of the cases comes before the court upon the voluntary petition of the claimant, under Revised Statutes, section 1059; the other two by transmission from committees of Congress, under the Bowman Act (March 3, 1883, chap. 116, 22 Stat. L., 485).
Claimants frequently cite the language of section 1063 of the Revised Statutes and of sections 1 and 2 of the Bowman Act, identical in all…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- McKee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1876
- Hart's Administrator v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1879
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ravesies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1886
- Vance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1895
- Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1893
- United States v. St. Louis Clay Products Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1946
- Hinkley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.