Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Huedner

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 7, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The questions here presented concern the propriety of the allowance of two claims against this estate. There is insufficient personalty from which to pay them and the executor has petitioned for the sale of the realty in the event of their allowance.

*102The first is made by the physician who attended decedent in her last illness; the second by the husband who seeks to recover for work alleged to have been performed and moneys claimed to have been expended by him in alterations to the house and grounds, for mortgage interest and water rates on real property belonging to the decedent in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. In re BlakeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of TottenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. In re Shipman's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WilliamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. Truax v. EllettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  3. In re the Estate of RubinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  4. In re the Accounting of TerryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API