In re the Estate of Rubin
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
S. Samuel Di Falco, S.
The following rulings are made upon the objections addressed to the account of the executor by the husband of the decedent: Objections 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7 are based upon the objectant’s assertion of his right to exempt property under section 200 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, and the executor’s refusal to set off such property. The will, in its second paragraph, makes the minimum provision for the husband compatible with section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law. The third paragraph reads as follows: ‘ ‘ The foregoing provisions are in lieu of all claims which my said husband…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- De Brauwere v. . De BrauwereNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- In Re the Estate of BurridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Matter of Estate of Young v. . HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of BurtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of StadtmullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amplo v. Di MauroSuffolk County District Court · 1967
- In re the Estate of TisnowerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- In re the Estate of RubinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- State v. ReissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Clinic v. Nelson R., New York County Courts1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.