Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barr v. Engler

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1964No. 1561Published

1DissentYarrut, Judge

I disagree with the conclusions and decree of the majority, and concur in the dissent of Judge Samuel.

The only issue in the case is the tenure of intervenor, Judge Bossetta, when the Governor appointed him to fill the vacancy created on the Municipal Court by the election to the District Court of his predecessor. Was it until the end of the year in which the next regular election is held as provided in the Constitution, to-wit, November, 1964; or was it for the full unexpired term, ending December 31, 1968?

*36I have concluded that the Governor had the right to appoint intervenor as Judge of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meyers v. FlournoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  2. State v. JosephSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. State Ex Rel. Fernandez v. FeuchtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  4. Blessing v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  5. In re CoonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API