Bank of Montreal v. J. E. Potts Salt & Lumber Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Bill to foreclose a chattel mortgage. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
On the 24th day of November, 1890, the J. E. Potts Salt & Lumber Company was indebted to the complainants in divers sums, aggregating about $560,000, and on that date executed a chattel mortgage to secure this indebtedness, and at the same time executed a real-estate mortgage to the same .parties, securing the same demands. On the 28th of November a meeting of the creditors secured by these instruments was had, and it was decided to take steps to foreclose *348the mortgages, and have a receiver appointed. The present bill was filed for that' purpose. The defendants Harmon and Tisdale were…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Buell v. Buckingham & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Garrett v. Burlington Plow Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Hallam v. Indianola Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Whitwell v. WarnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. S. L. Agoos Tanning Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- O'Bear Jewelry Co. v. Volfer & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Sutton Manuf'g Co. v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Beach v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Coleman v. HageySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.