Legal Opinion

O'Bear Jewelry Co. v. Volfer & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1894PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Appeal from tlie City Court of Birmingham, in Equity. EÍeard before the Hon. W. "W. Wilkerson. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. 1. The bill is not single in its object; and the parties defendant are sued on not joint but several accounts.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tlie City Court of Birmingham, in Equity. EÍeard before the Hon. W. "W. Wilkerson. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. 1. The bill is not single in its object; and the parties defendant are sued on not joint but several accounts. The bill embraces two or more distinct subjects; it contains several distinct grounds of suits in equity, and is, therefore, bad for multifariousness. — 1 Daniel Ch. Prac., 334, note 1; American R. & C. Co. v. Linn, 93 Ala. 610 ; 3 Brick. Dig., 388 et seq.; 15 Amer. & Eng. Encyc. of Law, 947. 2. It does not appear from any…

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

— The present bill is filed by Volfer & Co. and others, as judgment creditors of the O’Bear Jewelry Co., a corporation. Said corporation, R. D. Johnston, The Alabama National Bank, G. S. O’Bear, Jr., W. G. O’Bear, F. C. O’Bear and W. B. Copeland *208are made parties defendant. It is made to appear by the bill that the 0’Bears and Copeland organized said corporation with a proposed or nominal capital of twenty-five thousand dollars divided into two hundred and fifty shares of one hundred dollars each. Of these G. S. O’Bear subscribed for eighty shares, or eight thousand dollars to be paid by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Wood v. DummerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1824
  4. Graham v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Hospes v. Northwestern Manuf'g & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Luedecke v. Des Moines Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Adler v. Van Kirk Land & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  3. Farley v. Alabama Terminal & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Force v. Age-Herald Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. Indian Land & Trust Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API