McNally v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action is based upon an accident insurance policy. The cause was tried to the court and a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant challenged the sufficiency thereof and moved for a dismissal, which motion was denied. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the challenge and motion were repeated, with a like ruling. The cause was submitted to the jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $3,400. The defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the ver- diet, and in the alternative for a new trial; both of which motions being…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Healey v. Mutual Accident Ass'n of the NorthwestIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Carnes v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Brown v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Travelers' Insurance v. DunlapIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Zinn v. Equitable Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Burns v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- Dow v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Woods v. Provident L. A. Ins. Co. of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.