Legal Opinion

McNally v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1931No. 22807. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action is based upon an accident insurance policy. The cause was tried to the court and a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant challenged the sufficiency thereof and moved for a dismissal, which motion was denied. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the challenge and motion were repeated, with a like ruling. The cause was submitted to the jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $3,400. The defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the ver- diet, and in the alternative for a new trial; both of which motions being…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Healey v. Mutual Accident Ass'n of the NorthwestIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Carnes v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Brown v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. Travelers' Insurance v. DunlapIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Zinn v. Equitable Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Burns v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Dow v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Woods v. Provident L. A. Ins. Co. of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API