Legal Opinion

Eriksson v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 2001No. 95,184PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, Viee Chief Justice.

1 The dispute between the parties arose because a limited liability company, Defendant, J.C. Meat Processing Company, L.L.C., failed to pay for emu (ostrich) meat processing equipment that Plaintiffs, John A. Eriksson and Linda L. Eriksson, had financed. The principals in J.C. Meat Processing were the Erriksons and Defendant, Jo Jones. J.C. Meat Processing had been formed to process emu meat but the emu market collapsed. The Erriksons filed suit to replevin the property against J.C. Meat Processing and Jones in Muskogee County. Jones had no personal liability to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. National Diversified Business Services, Inc. v. Corporate Financial Opportunities, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Wooten v. KnisleyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gross v. LincolnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Haggard v. Sunray Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. RAYMOND v. TAYLORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API