Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Knisley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1997No. 96-185PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The question that has been certified for our consideration is “whether R.C. 901.51 requires a criminal conviction before treble damages may be imposed pursuant [to] that section of the Revised Code.” For the reasons that follow, we find that a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite to the imposition of civil liability for treble damages under R.C. 901.51.

R.C. 901.51 provides:

“No person, without privilege to do so, shall recklessly cut down, destroy, girdle, or otherwise injure a vine, bush, shrub, sapling, tree, or crop standing or growing on the land of another or upon public land.
“In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Denoyer v. LambOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Miller v. JordanOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Dick Lavy Farms, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Meranda Nixon Estate Wine, L.L.C. v. Cherry Fork Farm Supply Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Hayes v. CarriganOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Barker v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Wooten v. KnisleyOhio Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API