Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1993No. A058038PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

Appellant was convicted following a jury trial of misdemeanor indecent exposure in violation of Penal Code section 314, subdivision 1.1 On appeal, he challenges that part of this sentence which requires him to register as a sex offender pursuant to section 290.

The evidence presented at trial shows that Renee Lepre (hereafter…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. WingoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. NormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. People v. ChaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Johnson v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. In Re Adrian R.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. Alexander CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API