DiCarlo v. DeMoulas Supermarkets, Inc.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant-supermarket, Demoulas Supermarkets, Inc. (“Demoulas”), after a jury verdict for its customer, plaintiff Rita DiCarlo (“DiCarlo”), who slipped and fell on store premises. Demoulas argues on appeal that (1) the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to warrant the jury’s finding of negligence, and (2) the trial judge erred in admitting certain medical records and a photograph of the scene of the fall into evidence.
The facts are fairly straightforward. There was evidence that on May 26, 2000, the Friday before the Memorial Day weekend, DiCarlo was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oliveri v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Horowitz v. BokronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Sahagan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Bailey v. Cataldo Ambulance Service, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Goldberg v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Borges v. McGovern's Family RestaurantMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
- Rizzo v. CotterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007