State v. Kuhnley
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Chief Justice.
Defendant, W. F. Kuhnley, was.convicted ■of a felony, to wit: the crime of receiving ■stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen — a violation of section 43-5506, A.C. A.1939. He has appealed from the judgment of conviction and the denial of his motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial.
Briefly the facts stated in the light most favorable to the State present an almost unbelievable and fantastic situation. The 60 year old defendant is a licensed osteopathic physician, having practiced his profession for the past 28 years in Pima County, and for the past 3…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keefe v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- State v. CourseyArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. TilleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Imbraguglia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. VillavicencioArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. ShollMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. DelgadoMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. DaymusArizona Supreme Court · 1961
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.