Legal Opinion

State v. Kuhnley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1952No. 1020PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

Defendant, W. F. Kuhnley, was.convicted ■of a felony, to wit: the crime of receiving ■stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen — a violation of section 43-5506, A.C. A.1939. He has appealed from the judgment of conviction and the denial of his motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial.

Briefly the facts stated in the light most favorable to the State present an almost unbelievable and fantastic situation. The 60 year old defendant is a licensed osteopathic physician, having practiced his profession for the past 28 years in Pima County, and for the past 3…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Keefe v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. State v. CourseyArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. TilleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Imbraguglia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. VillavicencioArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. ShollMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. DelgadoMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. DaymusArizona Supreme Court · 1961

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API