People v. Sholl
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
At the conclusion of a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of third-degree criminal sexual conduct. The Court of Appeals reversed, finding three instances of error. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the defendant’s conviction.
i
In this case, the defendant and the complainant were in the initial stages of a dating relationship. They had spent time together on several occasions. *732On a January evening in 1992, they had sexual intercourse. The defendant says that the sexual relations were voluntary. The complainant says that they were accomplished through force or…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Anderson v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- People v. AldrichMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. RiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.