Legal Opinion

People v. Sholl

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1996No. Docket 106139PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Per curiam

At the conclusion of a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of third-degree criminal sexual conduct. The Court of Appeals reversed, finding three instances of error. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the defendant’s conviction.

i

In this case, the defendant and the complainant were in the initial stages of a dating relationship. They had spent time together on several occasions. *732On a January evening in 1992, they had sexual intercourse. The defendant says that the sexual relations were voluntary. The complainant says that they were accomplished through force or…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Anderson v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. People v. AldrichMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  4. People v. RiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API