Legal Opinion

Holly Corporation v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 20, 1937No. 14,165PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

An action by A. E. Wilson to recover from the Holly Sugar Corporation the value of shares of its preferred stock owned by him, and accumulation of dividends thereon. Becovery was adjudged.

It appears that November 4, 1916, Wilson, a long" time resident of Canon City, purchased twenty shares of the corporation’s preferred stock, and in evidence of his purchase received certificates in that number of shares previously issued to another, duly assigned; that November 8, 1916, upon surrender of the assigned certificates, the corporation issued and delivered to Wilson four new certificates, each for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. . New Jersey Zinc Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Yeaman v. Galveston City CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Supply Ditch Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Mountain Water Works Construction Co. v. HolmeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. Owingsville & Mt. Sterling Turnpike Road Co. v. Bondurant's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Mastellone v. Argo Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1951
  3. Schneider v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc., and Central Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  5. Mastellone v. Argo Oil Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API