Supply Ditch Co. v. Elliott
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to District Court, Boulder County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Macon, C.
From the admissions of the pleadings in this case the following facts appear: During and prior to the year 1883, plaintiff in error was an incorporated ditch company, owning an irrigating ditch, and having its capital stock divided into shares, each of which entitled the holder thereof to take from said company ditch ten inches of water for irrigating purposes, upon the condition that he applied for such water before or by the 20th day of May of the year in which he desired to use the water, and pay or secure to the company the sum of $1 per inch for all the water he might use. In…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shaw v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Bank v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Duncan v. JaudonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Cockrell v. GurleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
- Spalding v. VandercookNew York Supreme Court · 1829
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Masser v. the London Operating Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Farmers Independent Ditch Co. v. Agricultural Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Jacobucci v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- O'Neil v. Wolcott Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Barnhouse v. DeweySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.