Legal Opinion

Koch Refining Co. v. United States Department of Energy

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1981No. Nos. 8-10, 8-11PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. PECK, Judge.

In 1974 Canada announced that it would reduce and eventually terminate exports of crude oil to the United States. In response to this announcement, the Federal Energy Administration (FEA), predecessor to the Department of Energy (DOE), promulgated the Canadian Crude Oil Allocation Program (CAP), 10 C.F.R. §§ 214.1 et seq. CAP’s stated purpose was the mitigation of the adverse effects of reductions in Canadian crude oil exports to U. S. firms that were dependent on Canadian crude oil.1

Pursuant to CAP, the Economic Regulatory Administration (ERA), that arm of DOE with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Eldon C. Hart v. John L. McLucas Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, and National Transportation Safety BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. C. Burglin v. Rogers C. B. Morton, as the Secretary of the Interior of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. BowdenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Curry v. BlockDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982
  2. Pennzoil Co. v. United States Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Brahms v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Rossi v. Mobil Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Exxon Corp. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API