Legal Opinion

Exxon Corp. v. Department of Energy

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 31, 1985No. Civ. A. 81-25 MMS, 81-99 MMSPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

These actions were brought by several major oil companies to set aside a decision by the Department of Energy (“DOE”) awarding $63.8 million in exception relief to the 341 Tract Unit of the Citronelle Field (“Citronelle” or “the Unit”), an oil producer. The award of relief was designed to alleviate the inequity of Citronelle’s being denied the benefits of a DOE regulatory program and to induce Citronelle to initiate a major crude oil recovery project, using tertiary enhanced recovery techniques. A substantial amount of this $63.8 million came from the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Pasco, Inc. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Cities Service Co. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Tenneco Oil Co. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. International Drilling & Energy Corp. v. WatkinsTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Exxon Corp. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Behm Family Corp. v. U.S. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1985
  5. Texaco, Inc. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API