Legal Opinion

Mize v. Harford Insurance

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided December 2, 1982No. Civ. A. 82-0064-DPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KISER, District Judge.

This is a suit by the Plaintiff, Darnelle Mize (“Mize”) against the Defendant, The Harford Mutual Insurance Company (“Company” or “Insurance Company”) arising out of a policy of homeowner’s insurance issued by the Defendant covering a house owned by Mize which was damaged by fire on August 30, 1981. The suit is in this Court on the basis of diversity of citizenship. Both parties waived trial by jury, and it was tried by the Court without a jury on October 5, 1982, and is now before the Court for decision as to both the facts and the law.

It is undisputed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Giant of Virginia, Inc. v. PiggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hayseeds, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Better Homes of Virginia, Inc. v. Budget Service Co. (In Re Better Homes of Virginia, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1985
  3. Jessen v. National Excess InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Rutledge v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Neises v. Soloman State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API