Legal Opinion

Marino v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 27, 1984No. 83-783PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Percy W. Marino and Vilai Marino appeal from a final judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Angelina Smith, Senry Boler and Charlotte Douglas, in a suit in ejectment. We affirm.

Part of the testimony in this case was presented by deposition and part was presented ore tenus before a circuit judge. He recused himself before making a decision. This case was then assigned to another circuit judge, who took further ore tenus testimony. He failed to make a decision and this case was submitted to still another circuit judge on the depositions taken and the transcripts of testimony taken before the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Mary Isabel Hiles, Individually and as Under the Will of Morgan Hiles, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. White v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. McCulloch v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Bell v. PritchardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harkins & Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Moss v. WOODROW REYNOLDS AND SON TIMBER CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Shirey v. PittmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  4. Tate v. Water Works & Sewer Board of OxfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API