Legal Opinion

Moore v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 3, 2009No. Case 5:07CR275Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PETER C. ECONOMUS, District Judge.

The instant matter is before the Court on Petitioner Roger Moore’s (“Moore”) Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Dkt. # 45; 46; 52; 54.) In said Motion, Moore claims to have received (1) ineffective assistance of counsel and (2) a sentence that violates the Constitution and laws of the United States. (Dkt. # 54.) For the reasons that follow, Moore’s Motion to Vacate is denied.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Moore was arrested and arraigned before Magistrate Judge James S. Gallas on April 16, 2007. (Dkt. # 61, at 1.)…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API