Legal Opinion
Kiley Krzyzek, et al. v. OpenX Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 27, 2026No. 3:25-cv-05588Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KILEY KRZYZEK, et al., Case No. 25-cv-05588-SI 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 10 OPENX TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 26 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is defendant OpenX’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ putative class action. 14 Dkt. No. 26. The Court held a hearing on January 16, 2026. After considering the papers and oral 15 argument, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART defendant’s motion to dismiss. 16 17 BACKGROUND 18 Plaintiffs bring this putative…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.