Legal Opinion

Siebert v. Jacob Dudenhoefer Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1922PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinon was filed June 6, 1922:

DoerfleR, J.

Appellant assigns as errors: (1) the sustaining of defendant’s demurrer ore terms; and (2) the refusal of the trial court to vacate the judgment of dismissal.

Sub. (5), sec. 4222, Stats., among other things provides:

“No action to recover damages for an injury to the person shall be maintained unless, within two years after the happening of the event causing such damages, notice in writing . . . shall be served upon the person or corporation by whom it is claimed such damage was caused.”

It has been held by this' court that service of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aultman Taylor Co. v. . SymeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Klingbeil v. SaucermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Seymour v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Kalckhoff v. ZoehklautWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Acme Body Works v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Geiger v. Calumet CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Livesey v. Copps Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  4. Krestich v. StefanezWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Terbush v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API