Legal Opinion

Krestich v. Stefanez

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1943PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The' complaint alleges that plaintiff is a housewife and defendant a duly licensed physician and surgeon; that in September, 1928, plaintiff and her husband, having confidence in defendant, employed him to treat plaintiff for a malady; that defendant accepted the employment; that on September 22, 1928, defendant, in association with another surgeon selected by him, performed an- operation to remove plaintiff’s gall bladder; that the stitching and sewing of the incision was done by defendant; that in the course of this operation defendant left a surgical needle and part of another needle in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pietsch v. MilbrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Klingbeil v. SaucermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ott v. HoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Lotten v. O'BrienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hoffmann v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,975 Michelle K. Tomera, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Arthur T. Galt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. McCluskey v. ThranowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Reistad v. ManzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Stacey v. PantanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Volk v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API