Legal Opinion

Pyle v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided November 19, 1973No. 5343PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

This action arises out of an intersectional collision allegedly caused by the state’s negligence in failing to replace a downed stop sign within a reasonable time after having actual or constructive notice of the defect. In the two-count complaint, claimant Mildred M. Pyle seeks damages for personal injuries she suffered in the collision. Her husband, Billy Pyle, claims damages for the loss of his wife’s services and consortium as a result of her injuries. [Hereafter the word "claimant” in the singular refers to Mildred M. Pyle unless otherwise indicated.]

The accident occurred at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Maki v. FrelkIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Applebee v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Conner v. McGrewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  5. Lyle v. FioritoWashington Supreme Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1981
  2. Hodges v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1995
  3. Sutter v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API