Legal Opinion

Smith v. Estate of Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Appeal from the disallowance by commissioners of a claim against the estate of a deceased person. Claimant brings error from a judgment disallowing the claim. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.

James B. Smith, as assignee of Abram Smith, presented a claim against the estate of Eugene Smith, deceased, before the commissioners on claims, for logs loaned as follows:

1873.

May 36. Pine logs................138,480 ft. at $13 per M.

June 3. Pine logs................137,440 ft. at 13 per M.

Nov. 1. Short logs.............- 4,336 ft. at 13 per M.

Nov. 1. Long logs.............. 36,073 ft. at 13 per M.

Nov. 1. Hemlock logs..-........ 998 ft. at 8 per M. 1874.

Aug. 33. Pine logs............... 3,060 ft. at 13 per M.

In the statement of his claim, it was admitted that Eugene Smith returned to Abram…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ward v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Lower v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. Thrall v. Estate of MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1868
  4. Ball v. Keokuk & Northwestern R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. Massie v. ByrdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gossard v. GossardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  2. Barer v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Fallon v. FallonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Johnston v. KeeferIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Scott Mining & Smelting Co. v. ShultzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API