Scott Mining & Smelting Co. v. Shultz
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Cherokee district court; A. TT. Skid-more, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
This was an action of replevin to recover a steam drill which had been used in mining operations. Under a contract the Scott Mining and Smelting Company leased property consisting of land, machinery, tools and supplies to George A. Williams for a term of years. He operated the mine for a number of months, when the property in controversy passed into the possession of the defendants Shultz & Clary, who refused to deliver it to the Scott Mining and Smelting Company upon its demand, and thereupon the present action was brought.
The question…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Powder Co. v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Smith v. Estate of SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Mallory v. . WillisNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- National Car & Locomotive Builder v. Cyclone Steam Snow Plow Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Saulsbury Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- First National Bank v. McIntosh & Peters Live-stock & Commission Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Morse v. La Crosse Milling, Grain, & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Bonnett v. Farmers & Growers Shipping Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Alamitos Land Co. v. Texas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.