Legal Opinion

State v. Ford

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 7, 1990No. 23209PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

This case presents the novel issue of whether a new scientific technique, DNA Print Identification or Restriction Fragment Link Polymorphism (RFLP) is admissible into evidence in a judicial proceeding in South Carolina.

Stacy Ford appeals his conviction of conspiracy, kidnapping and criminal sexual conduct in the first degree. We affirm.

In the early morning hours on November 1, 1987, the victim rode home from a Georgetown County nightclub with Ford’s codefendant Archie Fraser. After they had driven approximately one-half mile, a man rose out of the back seat. He was wearing a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Spencer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. Spencer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  5. Andrews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. ShreckSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. United States v. Adrian Paul MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API