Whitener v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bloodworth, J.(a) “In the absence of a timely motion for a mistrial? a new trial will not be granted because of questions *677propounded by the trial judge to a witness under examination. Whether the asking of the questions would have amounted to error requiring a reversal, had a motion for mistrial been promptly made, need not be decided.” Kay v. Benson, 152 Ga. 185 (2) (108 S. E. 779); Quarles v. State, 37 Ga. App. 520 (3) (140 S. E. 788); Edenfield v. State, 37 Ga. App. 628 (4) (141 S. E. 220).
(&) “Objections to the admission of testimony are insufficient where no specific ground of objection…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Rome Railroad v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Atlanta Life Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Charles v. BrookerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Kay v. BensonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Laney v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Byrd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Cline v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Holland v. RyalsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Town Finance Corporation v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.