Legal Opinion

Whitener v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1929No. 19653PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.(a) “In the absence of a timely motion for a mistrial? a new trial will not be granted because of questions *677propounded by the trial judge to a witness under examination. Whether the asking of the questions would have amounted to error requiring a reversal, had a motion for mistrial been promptly made, need not be decided.” Kay v. Benson, 152 Ga. 185 (2) (108 S. E. 779); Quarles v. State, 37 Ga. App. 520 (3) (140 S. E. 788); Edenfield v. State, 37 Ga. App. 628 (4) (141 S. E. 220).

(&) “Objections to the admission of testimony are insufficient where no specific ground of objection…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  2. Rome Railroad v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Atlanta Life Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Charles v. BrookerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Kay v. BensonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Laney v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  2. Byrd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Cline v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Holland v. RyalsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Town Finance Corporation v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API