Legal Opinion

Holland v. Ryals

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 5, 1930No. 20199PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first special ground of the motion for a new trial alleges error “ because the court refused to exclude, upon motion of defendant, all the testimony of the plaintiff S. L. Byals in reference to the terms of the trade and the delivery of the car, as hearsay; Byals having testified in the beginning that he had sold to Mr. Holland a Ford car for $150, and that it had been delivered to Mr. Holland.” This ground of the motion is not complete within itself. The evidence to the admission of which objection is made is not set forth in such detail that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. DiCristinaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  3. Staples v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Farmers Union Warehouse, Storage Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Whitener v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cowart v. GunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Willis v. Seiberling Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Grier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Pritchett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Foster v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API