Legal Opinion
Laney v. Barr
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 28, 1939No. 27534PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
1. An objection was made to certain testimony on the ground that it was “irrelevant and immaterial.” No more specific objection was stated at the time the evidence was offered. Such objection is too general. The attention of the court must be called to the specific ground of objection at the time the evidence is offered; and unless this is done no question is raised for decision by this court. Legg v. Legg, 165 Ga. 314 (140 S. E. 868); Whitman v. State, 39 Ga. App. 547, 548 (147 S. E. 798); Whitener v. State, 39 Ga. App. 676, 677 (148 S. E. 305); Scott v. State, 46 Ga. App. 213, 216 (167 S.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cotton States Fertilizer Co. v. ChildsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Wheeler v. SalingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Fountain v. Fuller E. Callaway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Richter v. Atlantic CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Thomason v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- McBride v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.