Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Stoddard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion, made on the eve of trial and more than one year after the note of issue and certificate of readiness had been filed, inter alia, to compel the plaintiff to provide authorizations for the release of certain medical and employment records. The defendant failed to make any showing that “unusual or unanticipated circumstances” developed subsequent to the filing of the note of issue and certificate of readiness requiring additional pretrial proceedings to prevent substantial prejudice (22 NYCRR 202.21 [d];…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Silverberg v. GuzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Gomez v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Blankenship v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Meadow Lane Equities Corp. v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API