Legal Opinion
Gomez v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 6, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated July 7, 2004, which granted the motion of the defendant New York City Transit Authority, inter alia, to strike the note of issue and compel discovery to the extent of directing her to submit to a deposition and physical examination.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, with costs, and the motion is denied.
Since the defendant New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the NYCTA) failed to move to vacate the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Audiovox Corp. v. BenyaminiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- James v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Mayo v. Lincoln Triangle Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Rodriguez v. Sau Wo LauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Gordon v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. P.M.A. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- White v. Mazella-WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Meadow Lane Equities Corp. v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Rhodes v. StoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012