Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 9, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Ronald DeMeo and Carmine DeMeo appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.), dated October 31, 1985, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel the plaintiffs to produce an authorization for the release of certain medical records.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Based upon the record before us, we conclude that the appellants failed to demonstrate that "unusual or unanticipated circumstances” developed subsequent to the filing of the note of issue and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Di Maria v. Coordinated Ranches, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Ehrhart v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Chaloupka v. Neil's Plumbing and Heating, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bilotti v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Rhodes v. StoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API