Legal Opinion

Fercenia v. Guiduli

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 28, 2003No. 02-451PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Defendants Dr. Robert Guiduli and Guiduli Opthamalic Associates, Inc., bring this interlocutory appeal from an order of the Chittenden Superior Court denying their motion for judgment on the pleadings. Defendants contend that plaintiff Jean Fercenia’s failure to comply with the requirements set forth in Vermont Rule of Civil Procedure 3 and the waiver of service requirements set forth in Rule 4(1) resulted in the expiration of plaintiff’s cause of action under the applicable statute of limitations. The trial court, in denying defendants’ motion, found that plaintiffs failure to comply…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Sorge v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Knight v. RowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. Lane v. Town of GraftonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. McLaughlin v. BlakeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Michael Quinlan, of the Estate of Lincy Sullivan v. Five-Town Health Alliance, Inc., dba Mountain Health Center and Sean May, PA-CSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  2. Jane Doe v. Victoria CamachoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
  3. Laura Clark as Personal Representative of the Estate of Christopher Tylie Jackson-Clark v. Richard Baker, M.D., Mary Beerworth, M.D.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. Reed Doyle v. City of Burlington Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  5. Clarke v. AbateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API