Legal Opinion
Hilliard v. Twin Falls County Sheriff's Office
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided January 11, 2023No. 1:18-cv-00550Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO BRENT E. HILLIARD, an individual, Case No. 1:18-cv-00550-CWD Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND v. ORDER TWIN FALLS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, a Public Entity, and TWIN FALLS COUNTY, a Public Corporation, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Petition for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), filed with respect to the Court’s order granting a new trial and vacating the Amended Judgment entered in this matter on September 14, 2022. (Dkts. 211, 202.) Defendants oppose permission to appeal. (Dkt. 218.)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- James R. Ahrenholz, Plaintiff-Appellee/respondent v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Defendant-Appellant/petitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Tom L. Ashlock v. Conseco Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Couch v. Telescope Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.