Legal Opinion

Parker v. Genson

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 9, 2017No. Case Number: 114451PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Bay Mitchell, Presiding Judge:

¶ 1 Plaintiffs/Appellants Anthony Parker and - Kenneth Parker (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court’s denial of their Motion for New Trial following an award of prevailing-party attorney fees in the amount of $394,556.75, plus a 25 percent bonus fee, and costs in the amount of $23,289.83 to Defendani/Appellee Michael Genson (“Defendant” or “Michael Genson”). Following our review of the applicable law and facts, we REVERSE the decision of. the trial court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this-opinion.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Fulsom v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kevin L. Jeter; Joe A. Jeter; Barbara Lucas; James H. Miller; Sharon Rigsby Miller; Larry Smith; Janice Sue Parker v. Vetsus Wild West Gas, LLC; Wild West Gas, Inc.; Bullseye Energy, LLC; Fountainhead, LLC; KRS&K; CEP Mid-Continent, LLC; Robert M. Kane; Louise Kane Roark; Ann Kane Seidman; Mark Kane; Pamela Brown; Gary Brown; Gashoma, Inc.; Purgatory Creek Gas, Inc.; Redbird Oil; White Hawk Gas, Inc.; and Kevin L. Jeter; Joe A. Jeter; Barbara Lucas; James H. Miller; Sharon Rigsby Miller; Larry Smith; Janice Sue Parker; James D. Enloe; Carolyn R. Enloe; Scott Baily v. CEP Mid-Continent, LLC; Robert M. Kane; Louise Kane Roark; Ann Kane Seidman; Mark Kane; Pamela Brown; Gary BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API