Legal Opinion

Whitman Requardt & Associates L.L.P. v. ARGO Systems, LLC

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 21, 2021No. 1:21-cv-02107Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND WHITMAN,REQUARDT& * ASSOCIATES, LLP, et al. * * Plaintiffs, . : VS. * Civil Action No. ADC-21-2107 . ARGO SYSTEMS, LLC, et.al. * * Defendants. * AREN EHEAEEEAENKEN □ MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendants ARGO Systems, LLC (“ARGO”) and the Hanover Insurance Company . (“HIC”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move this Court to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Whitman, Requardt & Associates, LLP (““WRA”) and the United States of- America for the use of WRA (collectively, .. “Plaintiffs”) Complaint or, in the alternative, to stay the action pending…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API