Whitman Requardt & Associates L.L.P. v. ARGO Systems, LLC
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND WHITMAN,REQUARDT& * ASSOCIATES, LLP, et al. * * Plaintiffs, . : VS. * Civil Action No. ADC-21-2107 . ARGO SYSTEMS, LLC, et.al. * * Defendants. * AREN EHEAEEEAENKEN □ MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendants ARGO Systems, LLC (“ARGO”) and the Hanover Insurance Company . (“HIC”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move this Court to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Whitman, Requardt & Associates, LLP (““WRA”) and the United States of- America for the use of WRA (collectively, .. “Plaintiffs”) Complaint or, in the alternative, to stay the action pending…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.