Patrick English v. United States of America, Derek Tano v. United States of America, Lutrell Davis v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Concurrence by Judge BROWNING.
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Introduction
This case forces us to attempt to make some sense of the procedural morass that surrounds habeas corpus. In all three cases, a United States magistrate presided over voir dire without the consent of the defendants. While the cases were still pending on direct appeal, the Supreme Court in Gomez v. United States, 490 U.S. 858, 109 S.Ct. 2237, 104 L.Ed.2d 923 (1989), held that it is per se reversible error for a magistrate to preside over jury selection in a felony trial without the defendant’s…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- The Export Group Emilio Figueroa Jack Andrews v. Reef Industries, Inc., and Mexican Coffee InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Kornahrens v. EvattCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Feldon Jackson, Jr. v. John ShanksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.