Turman Oil Co. v. Sapulpa Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAY, C.
November 22, 1921 be Tiu-man Oil Company and the Sapulpa lefining Company entered into two written ontracts, by wbicb it was agreed that the il company would sell and deliver into the alining company’s pipe lines, and the re-niug company would buy, all the crude oil reduced on the Loman and Thompson leases or a period o£ one year beginning December 1, 1922, for which the refining company greed- to pay the posted market price per arrel, on the day it was run, paid by the ’rairie Oil & Uas Company for “Jlid-Conti-íent crude,” and in addition thereto a pre-lium of 35 cents per…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Withington v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Bearmar v. Dux Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Humaston v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Smyth v. CraigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Interstate Plywood Sales Company, a Corporation v. Interstate Container Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964