Bearmar v. Dux Oil & Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by the Dux Oil & Gas Company against Sam Wilson and another, in which J. A. Bearman intervened. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and intervener brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtItardx, J.
This action was commenced' in the superior court of Tulsa county by the Dux Oil & Gas Company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Sam and Lulie Wilson, who will be referred to as defendants, seeking-'to enjoin said defendants from interfering- with plaintiff; in exploring for oil and gas under a certain oil and gas lease executed by defendants. Plaintiff in error, J. A. Bearman, who will be referred to as intervener, was permitted to intervene. The case was afterwards transferred to the district court of said county. The lease was dated February 1, 1912, and for a consideration of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Deweese v. ReinhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Frank Oil Co. v. Belleview Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Anthis v. Sullivan Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Mussellem v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Curtis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Brennan v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.