Legal Opinion

Haupt v. Moore

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1935No. 7605Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

On May 4, 1933, the bankrupt, which was engaged in a general trucking business, entered into what was called a conditional sales contract by which the bankrupt purported to purchase from the appellant Haupt the property then owned by the bankrupt. The possession of the property both before and after the sale remained in the bankrupt. The conditional sales contract was in effect a chattel mortgage. 5 Cal. Jur. 80, § 31; Bonestell v. Western Auto-Motive Finance Corp., 69 Cal. App. 719, 232 P. 734; Pacific Finance Co. v. Hendley, 103 Cal. App. 335, 284 P. 736, 285 P. 1048;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Noyes v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Pacific Finance Corp. v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Bonestell v. Western Automotive Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Lemon v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Klepper v. American-LaFrance Fire Engine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API