Daines v. Spokane County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The Public Disclosure Act requires governmental agencies to disclose public records upon request. To trigger the remedial provisions of the act, the suit must be one that could be reasonably regarded as necessary to obtain the records. In this case, Bernard Daines was one of nine plaintiffs in a pending administrative action. In that suit, Spokane County provided discovery of certain e-mails that Mr. Daines now requests in this public disclosure lawsuit. The County initially denied the existence of these records. Upon learning of this mistake, it acknowledged that there were hard copies…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- James Miller v. United States Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Diversified Industries Development Corp. v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF SPOKANE v. SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- BUILDING INDUSTRY ASS'N v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Building Industry Ass'n v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Zink v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Mitchell v. Washington State Institute of Public PolicyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.